Home Economics: Nationalism and the Making of 'Migrant Workers' in Canada
A massive shift has taken place in Canadian immigration policy since the 1970s: the majority of migrants no longer enter as permanent residents but as temporary migrant workers. In Home Economics, Nandita Sharma shows how Canadian policies on citizenship and immigration contribute to the entrenchment of a system of apartheid where those categorized as migrant workers live, work, pay taxes and sometimes die in Canada but are subordinated to a legal regime that renders them as perennial outsiders to nationalized Canadian society.
In calling for a no borders policy in Canada, Sharma argues that it is the acceptance of nationalist formulations of home informed by racialized and gendered relations that contribute to the neo-liberal restructuring of the labour market in Canada. She exposes the ideological character of Canadian border control policies which, rather than preventing people from getting in, actually work to restrict their rights once within Canada. Home Economics is an urgent and much-needed reminder that in today's world of growing displacement and unprecedented levels of international migration, society must pay careful attention to how nationalist ideologies construct homelands that essentially leave the vast majority of the world's migrant peoples homeless.
- World Rights
- Page Count: 220 pages
- Dimensions: 6.0in x 0.6in x 9.0in
Author InformationNandita Sharma is an assistant professor in the Departments of Ethnic Studies and Sociology at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Table of contents
Tables and Figures
Foreword by Roxana Ng
- Home(lessness) and the Naturalization of ‘Difference’
- Globalization and the Story of National Sovereignty
- Imagined states: The Ideology of ‘National Society’
- Canadian Parliamentary Discourse and the Making of ‘Migrant Workers’
- Canada’s Non-Immigrant Employment Authorization Program (NIEAP): The Social Organization of Unfreedom forMigrant Workers’
- Rejecting Global Apartheid: An Essay on the Refusal of‘Difference’
Subjects and Courses