Not This Time: Canadians, Public Policy, and the Marijuana Question, 1961-1975

By Marcel Martel

© 2006

Drugs are part of every society, consumed for ritual or religious purposes, for pleasure, to enhance athletic performance, or as a means to relieve pain. Throughout the twentieth century, however, an arbitrary and shifting distinction was made between legal drugs that were prescribed and administered by the medical profession, and illegal drugs that were subject to state control and suppression.

Illegal in Canada since 1923, marijuana is the most controversial of illegal drugs. Because it lacks the same addictive and harmful qualities of other illegal substances, such as heroin and cocaine, marijuana's negative social impact is questionable. In the 1960s interest groups – including university student associations, certain physicians, and others – began demanding changes to the Narcotics Control Act, which governed the legal status of drugs, to decriminalize or legalize the possession of marijuana.

In Not This Time, Marcel Martel explores recreational use of marijuana in the 1960s and its emergence as a topic of social debate. He demonstrates how the media, interest groups, state institutions, bureaucrats and politicians influenced the development and implementation of public policy on drugs. Martel illustrates how two loose coalitions both made up of interest groups, addiction research organizations and bureaucrats – one supporting the existing drug legislation, and the other favoring liberalization of the Narcotics Control Act – dominated the debate over the legalization of marijuana, and how those favoring liberalized drug laws, while influential, had difficulty presenting a unified front and problems justifying their cause while the health benefits of marijuana use were still in question. Exploring both sides of the debate, Martel presents the invigorating history of a question that continues to reverberate in the minds of Canadians.

Electronic Format Disclaimer: Images removed at the request of the rights holder.

Continue Reading Read Less

Product Details

  • Series: Heritage
  • Division: Scholarly Publishing
  • World Rights
  • Page Count: 300 pages
  • Dimensions: 6.0in x 0.0in x 9.0in
Product Formats

SaveUP TO 9239

Book Formats

SKU# SP002246

  • PUBLISHED MAR 2006

    From: $29.96

    Regular Price: $39.95

    ISBN 9780802093790
  • PUBLISHED APR 2006

    From: $59.25

    Regular Price: $79.00

    ISBN 9780802090485
  • PUBLISHED DEC 2006

    From: $28.46

    Regular Price: $37.95

Quick Overview

In Not This Time, Marcel Martel explores recreational use of marijuana in the 1960s and its emergence as a topic of social debate.


Electronic Format Disclaimer: Images removed at the request of the rights holder.

Not This Time: Canadians, Public Policy, and the Marijuana Question, 1961-1975

By Marcel Martel

© 2006

Drugs are part of every society, consumed for ritual or religious purposes, for pleasure, to enhance athletic performance, or as a means to relieve pain. Throughout the twentieth century, however, an arbitrary and shifting distinction was made between legal drugs that were prescribed and administered by the medical profession, and illegal drugs that were subject to state control and suppression.

Illegal in Canada since 1923, marijuana is the most controversial of illegal drugs. Because it lacks the same addictive and harmful qualities of other illegal substances, such as heroin and cocaine, marijuana's negative social impact is questionable. In the 1960s interest groups – including university student associations, certain physicians, and others – began demanding changes to the Narcotics Control Act, which governed the legal status of drugs, to decriminalize or legalize the possession of marijuana.

In Not This Time, Marcel Martel explores recreational use of marijuana in the 1960s and its emergence as a topic of social debate. He demonstrates how the media, interest groups, state institutions, bureaucrats and politicians influenced the development and implementation of public policy on drugs. Martel illustrates how two loose coalitions both made up of interest groups, addiction research organizations and bureaucrats – one supporting the existing drug legislation, and the other favoring liberalization of the Narcotics Control Act – dominated the debate over the legalization of marijuana, and how those favoring liberalized drug laws, while influential, had difficulty presenting a unified front and problems justifying their cause while the health benefits of marijuana use were still in question. Exploring both sides of the debate, Martel presents the invigorating history of a question that continues to reverberate in the minds of Canadians.

Electronic Format Disclaimer: Images removed at the request of the rights holder.

Continue Reading Read Less

Product Details

  • Series: Heritage
  • Division: Scholarly Publishing
  • World Rights
  • Page Count: 300 pages
  • Dimensions: 6.0in x 0.0in x 9.0in
  • Reviews

    Not This Time provides a fascinating and detailed account of how debate on Marijuana played out in the past; whether it is now “the time” for the legalization of marijuana is a much more open question.’
    Alex Mold
    Histoire sociale vol41:81:08
  • Author Information

    Marcel Martel is a professor and Avie Bennett Historica Canada Chair in Canadian History at York University.
  • Table of contents

    List of Illustrations

    Acknowledgments

    Introduction

    1. ‘A Growing Problem’: Reporting and Measuring the Use of Illegal Drugs
    2. ‘We Can’t Afford to Take a Neutral Position’: Interest Groups and Marijuana Use
    3. The Scientific Experts and Provincial Governments: Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, and Prince Edward Island
    4. Debating Marijuana Use: The Le Dain Commission, 1969–1973
    5. A Small Step beyond the Status Quo: The Federal Government and Recreational Drug Use

    Conclusion

    Notes

    Bibliography

    Index

By the Same Author(s)

Related Titles